Scaled Agile SSM Practice Exam Questions & Answers

One way to ensure a team is holding successful iteration reviews and demos is to have the team demo working, tested system components that meet the definition of done (DoD). This shows the team's progress and value delivery, and allows them to receive feedback from the product owner and other stakeholders. The team should minimize the use of slides and the preparation time for the demos, and focus on the solution instead of the presentation. The team should also discuss the impact of the current solution on the nonfunctional requirements (NFRs) and identify any risks or impediments.

:

Iteration Review - Scaled Agile Framework

Exam Study Guide: SSM (6.0) - SAFe Scrum Master

According to the SAFe 6 Scrum Master documentation, one of the potential root causes of Team Sync anti-patterns is the lack of collective ownership. Collective ownership means that the team members share responsibility for the quality and delivery of the team's work. They collaborate, communicate, and coordinate their efforts to achieve the team goals. They also support each other, provide feedback, and resolve issues together.When there is a lack of collective ownership, team members may exhibit some of the following Team Sync anti-patterns1:

Reporting to managers (status meetings): Team members use the Team Sync as a way to report their progress to the SM/TC or other managers, rather than to synchronize with their peers. This can create a hierarchical and command-and-control culture, where team members are not empowered to self-organize and self-manage.

Monologues: Team members give long and detailed updates that are not relevant or useful to other team members. This can make the Team Sync boring, inefficient, and ineffective, as team members lose interest and attention.

Cross-functional team standups (updates are not related to other people's work): Team members work on different features or components that are not aligned with the team goals or the Iteration goals. This can result in silos, dependencies, and integration issues, as well as reduced collaboration and coordination.

''Nothing to report'' can be a good thing: Team members say they have nothing to report, either because they have not done any work, or because they do not want to share their work with the team. This can indicate a lack of transparency, trust, and accountability, as well as a missed opportunity to get feedback and support from the team.

To overcome these anti-patterns, the SM/TC should coach the team on the purpose and value of the Team Sync, and help them adopt the best practices for effective Team Syncs, such as2:

Having a clear agenda and timebox

Focusing on the team goals and the Iteration goals

Asking the three key questions: What did I do yesterday? What will I do today? Do I have any impediments?

Using visual aids, such as task boards or Kanban boards, to track progress and identify issues

Encouraging active participation, collaboration, and feedback

Ending with clear action items and follow-ups

:

Scrum Master/Team Coach

Team Sync

Top 7 Anti Patterns of Scrum Master - Simpliaxis

Scrum Anti-Patterns Taxonomy | Scrum.org

[11 Daily Scrum Anti-Patterns We Commonly Hear from UsersIn ... - Geekbot

Hackathons are one of the activities that can be done during the IP Iteration to foster innovation and learning. They allow the team members to work on whatever they want, with whomever they want, as long as the work reflects the mission of the company. The teams then demo their work to others at the end of the hackathon. Hackathons can help the team explore new ideas, technologies, and solutions that can benefit the business and the customers. They can also increase the team's engagement, creativity, and collaboration.Reference:Innovation and Planning Iteration - Scaled Agile Framework,Exam Study Guide: SSM (6.0) - SAFe Scrum Master

PI Planning is one of the events that aligns teams on a train. PI Planning is a cadence-based event for the entire Agile Release Train (ART) that aligns teams and stakeholders to a shared mission and vision. PI Planning provides an opportunity for the ART to review the business context and priorities, identify and resolve dependencies and risks, and commit to a realistic and achievable plan for the next Program Increment (PI).PI Planning is essential to SAFe: If you are not doing it, you are not doing SAFe1

:

PI Planning - Scaled Agile Framework

Planning Interval (PI) - Scaled Agile Framework

Preparing for PI Planning | Checklist for Scrum Masters and Product ...

Scrum Master - Scaled Agile Framework

SAFe 6.0 Scrum Master Certification (SSM) Course - Vinsys

During PI Planning, the Scrum Master/Team Coach (SM/TC) plays an important facilitative and support role. One key responsibility is to participate in the management review and problem-solving meeting that occurs midway through PI Planning.

This meeting allows leaders and Scrum Masters to review the teams' progress, resolve cross-team risks, address scope challenges, and ensure alignment before finalizing PI objectives. The Scrum Master's insights into team capacity, dependencies, and risks are crucial for ART-level decision-making.

From SAFe guidance:

''Scrum Masters participate in the management review and problem-solving session during PI Planning to help resolve issues that may prevent teams from meeting their objectives.''

Therefore, the correct answer is B. Participate in management review and problem-solving.