What qualifications do I need before I can sit the CVS exam?

You must hold a current Value Methodology Associate (VMA) certification and have completed the Value Methodology Fundamentals 2 (VMF2) course. Your VMA must be in good standing when you submit your CVS application to the SAVE Certification Board.

Is the CVS exam just a multiple-choice test?

No. The CVS exam has two parts. Part 1 is an online proctored exam that tests your knowledge. Once you pass Part 1, you progress to Part 2, which is a live Function Analysis Facilitation where you lead a group and demonstrate your ability to apply Value Methodology in real time.

How much time do I have for the CVS exam?

Part 1 of the exam gives you 3 hours to complete the online questions. Part 2 involves a facilitation session where you lead a 60-minute maximum presentation of a Value Methodology study topic you select in advance.

What score do I need to pass the CVS exam?

You must achieve 70% or above on the CVS exam to pass. If you do not pass, you can retake the exam up to three times within a one-year period.

Can I take the CVS exam Part 2 online or do I have to be in person?

You can do either. The Function Analysis Facilitation portion can be conducted in person or via a virtual meeting platform. SAVE International schedules these based on the number of candidates and the availability of the Examination Panel assessors.

What happens if I fail one part of the CVS exam?

If you fail Part 1, you can retake the full two-part exam up to three times in one year. If you pass Part 1 but fail Part 2, the same retake rules apply and you will need to demonstrate your facilitation skills again.

How does CVS relate to the VMA certification?

The Value Methodology Associate (VMA) is the entry-level SAVE International certification for people new to Value Methodology. The CVS is the highest level of certification available through SAVE International and is designed for experienced practitioners and VM Program Managers who can lead and facilitate entire Value Methodology studies.

What does the Function Analysis Facilitation test in Part 2?

Part 2 evaluates your ability to facilitate a Value Methodology study in real time with a live team. You select a study topic in advance, design a facilitation session, and lead a group of five to seven other candidates through a structured analysis session. An Examination Panel of three or more assessors evaluates your facilitation skills and knowledge application.

How long should I spend preparing for the CVS exam?

Preparation time varies based on your experience level and existing knowledge of Value Methodology. Since CVS requires you to hold an active VMA and have completed VMF2, most candidates have already spent time learning the fundamentals. Allow several months of study time to prepare for both parts, especially to develop strong facilitation skills for Part 2.

Can I retake Part 2 if I pass Part 1 but fail the facilitation?

Yes. You can retake the exam up to three times in a one-year period, which includes retaking either or both parts. However, each retake requires reapplying and paying the associated fees to SAVE International.

CVS Practice Questions with Explained Answers

4 Free Questions · Last reviewed: September 8, 2026 · Prepared & Reviewed by the ValidExamDumps Editorial Team

143 Practice Questions (Our Bank)

3 hours (180 minutes) Exam Duration

70% Passing Score

Exam Code: CVS
Full Name: Certified Value Specialist
Issuing Body: SAVE International
Delivery: Two-part exam: Part 1 is online proctored. Part 2 is live Function Analysis Facilitation conducted in person or via virtual meeting platform
Eligibility: Must be a Value Methodology Associate (VMA) in good standing who has completed Value Methodology Fundamentals 2 (VMF2) course

Question 1 Domain 1Stimulate Interest

A CVS candidate is drafting the opening section of a final VM study report for a wastewater treatment plant expansion. The study sponsor's staff has expressed skepticism about the value of the study because prior VM efforts felt like generic checklist exercises. Which opening approach would best stimulate genuine interest in this specific study?

ABegin with a brief history of the Value Methodology and the SAVE International standard job plan

BOpen with a striking project-specific fact, such as the treatment plant's actual capacity shortfall and the community impact if it is not resolved, tied to why the VM team was engaged

CList all VM certifications held by the facilitation team to establish credibility

DRestate the standard definition of value as the ratio of function to cost

Correct Answer: B

Explanation

The correct answer engages the audience by grounding the opening in the specific project's stakes and relevance, which directly addresses skepticism about generic VM exercises. Generic definitions, job plan history, or credential lists are exactly the kind of boilerplate content that fails to stimulate interest because they are not tailored to the subject or audience.

Question 2 Domain 2Demonstrate Value Improvement

During a VM study of a hospital's emergency department layout, the team recommended relocating triage adjacent to imaging, reducing patient transport distance by 40% and eliminating a redundant corridor. In the final report, which presentation of this result best demonstrates value improvement specific to this study?

AState that 'the VM methodology successfully improved value as it always does when properly applied'

BPresent a before-and-after functional diagram of the ED layout, quantify the 40% reduction in transport distance and associated time savings, and show the cost impact of eliminating the redundant corridor

CSummarize the FAST diagram technique used without connecting it to the ED layout outcome

DNote that the team followed all phases of the job plan in sequence

Correct Answer: B

Explanation

Demonstrating value improvement requires showing concrete, measurable, subject-specific results connected to the VM application, such as the before-and-after comparison with quantified metrics. Generic claims about methodology success or simply describing techniques used do not demonstrate actual improvement to the specific study subject.

Question 3 Domain 3Communicate Achievement

A study sponsor for a highway interchange redesign stated at the study kickoff that their primary goals were reducing construction duration and minimizing traffic disruption during construction. In the final report's achievement section, which content best communicates achievement relative to sponsor goals?

AA general statement that the VM study reduced overall project cost by an unspecified amount

BA section showing the recommended phased construction sequence cut construction duration by 6 months and reduced peak-hour lane closures by 30%, directly referencing the sponsor's stated goals

CA list of all alternatives generated during the speculation phase, regardless of whether they were adopted

DAn explanation of the weighted evaluation matrix used to rank ideas

Correct Answer: B

Explanation

Communicating achievement requires explicitly tying results back to the sponsor's stated goals, in this case duration reduction and minimized disruption. The correct option quantifies outcomes against those exact goals. The other options either omit the connection to sponsor goals or describe process rather than outcome.

Question 4 Domain 4Avoid Regurgitation

A candidate's draft report for a school district's HVAC modernization study includes a two-page section explaining the general history and philosophy of Value Methodology, along with a generic list of 'benefits of VM studies' copied from a training manual, before addressing the actual study findings.

Is this section likely to be scored favorably under the 'Avoid Regurgitation' criterion?

ATrue

BFalse

Correct Answer: B

Explanation

False is correct. The 'Avoid Regurgitation' objective specifically penalizes restating generic VM concepts and benefits that are not tied to the specific study subject. A two-page generic history and benefits list copied from a manual, unconnected to the HVAC modernization findings, is precisely the kind of content that should be avoided; the report should instead focus on subject-specific content and outcomes.

Domain 1: Stimulate Interest 15%

Generate interest in the VM study subject and present the project, product, process, or organization in an engaging way that makes it relevant to the intended audience.

Sample question from this domain above: Q1

Domain 2: Demonstrate Value Improvement 25%

Show how Value Methodology was applied to the study subject and connect demonstrated improvements directly to the VM study outcomes.

Sample question from this domain above: Q2

Domain 3: Communicate Achievement 15%

Communicate the achievements of the VM study and relate them directly to the study sponsor's goals, showing how the study addressed those specific objectives.

Sample question from this domain above: Q3

Domain 4: Avoid Regurgitation 15%

Keep content specific to the VM study subject rather than repeating generic VM concepts or simply restating general VM benefits.

Sample question from this domain above: Q4

SAVE International CVS Practice Exam Questions & Answers

SAVE International CVS Exam Details

Free CVS Practice Questions

What the SAVE International CVS Exam Covers

CVS Exam FAQ