After conducting user interviews, a UX Designer finds that an equal amount of users prefer to use the Comfy density setting as the Compact density setting while viewing record details.
Which approach should be avoided by developers when building custom components to make sure their components take advantage of this setting?
When developers are building custom components in Salesforce and need to ensure that these components adapt to user preferences for density settings (Comfy or Compact), they should avoid using REM-based spacing values. This is because REM-based spacing does not automatically adjust based on the density setting chosen by the user, leading to a lack of consistency with the rest of the Salesforce UI, which does adapt to these settings. Instead, developers should:
A) Use the varSpacingMedium design token in CSS, as Salesforce Lightning Design System (SLDS) design tokens are context-aware and can adjust their values based on the density setting, ensuring a consistent user experience across different user preferences.
C) Use existing Lightning Components such as the card or page header, which are pre-built to adapt to density settings, ensuring that custom components align with the overall Salesforce UI and respect user settings for density.
Reference: Salesforce Lightning Design System (SLDS) documentation provides guidelines on using design tokens and building responsive components that respect user settings like density preferences. You can find more information on the official Salesforce Developers website or the SLDS documentation section.
A UX Designer needs to restyle a
Which key consideration about that LWC should the UX designer be aware of?
When restyling a <lightning-modal /> Lightning Web Component (LWC) to meet brand guidelines, it's important to know that styling customization options may be limited. Specifically, only the main Lightning Modal component can be styled using styling hooks. This limitation means that while you can apply brand-specific styles to the overall modal component using styling hooks, the finer control over the modal's internal sections (like the body, footer, and header) might not be directly accessible through these hooks. This constraint necessitates a strategic approach to styling, focusing on the aspects of the modal that can be customized to align with brand guidelines while understanding the inherent limitations.
Reference: For more information on styling Lightning Web Components and the use of styling hooks, the Salesforce Developer Documentation on Lightning Web Components and the Salesforce Lightning Design System (SLDS) offers detailed guidance and best practices.
What is a benefit of inclusive design?
Inclusive design is a methodology aimed at creating products that are accessible to as many people as possible, regardless of their abilities or circumstances. The benefit of inclusive design is that it focuses on reducing friction for users in achieving their goals by:
Considering a wide range of human diversity, including ability, language, culture, gender, age, and other forms of human difference.
Identifying and eliminating unnecessary barriers that might prevent people from effectively using a product or service.
Ensuring that products and services can be used by everyone, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation.
Inclusive design does not mean tailoring a solution to one type of user (B) or creating a lowest-common-denominator design that meets only the most basic needs of all users (C). Instead, it seeks to understand and address the needs of a broad audience to create more usable and accessible experiences for everyone.
Reference: The Interaction Design Foundation provides extensive resources on inclusive design, its principles, and how to apply them in the design process. These resources offer valuable insights into creating designs that are accessible and beneficial to a wide audience.
A UX Designer determines that the usability of their company's Salesforce org could be improved if there was a tight relationship between the objects Container and Container Bids. For example, Container Bids should be deleted automatically whenever its associated Container is deleted.
Which type of relationship should be used to optimize the link between Container and Container Bids?
To optimize the relationship between two objects in Salesforce, such as Container and Container Bids, where there is a need for a tight relationship and cascading delete functionality, a Master-Detail relationship is most suitable. This type of relationship has the following characteristics:
Cascading Delete: When a record in the master (or parent) object is deleted, all related detail (or child) records are automatically deleted. This ensures data integrity and aligns with the requirement that Container Bids should be deleted when their associated Container is deleted.
Tight Coupling: A Master-Detail relationship creates a strong linkage between the two objects, where the detail (child) record's existence is dependent on the master (parent) record. This is appropriate for scenarios where the child record should not exist without its parent.
Options B (Hierarchical Lookup) and C (Many-to-one Lookup) do not provide the same level of dependency and cascading delete functionality inherent in a Master-Detail relationship.
Reference: Salesforce's official documentation provides extensive information on different types of relationships between objects, including Master-Detail relationships. The Salesforce Developer Documentation is a valuable resource for understanding how to set up and use these relationships to ensure data integrity and optimize application design.
Cloud Kicks has already identified its user personas and is working with a UX Designer who wants to synthesize what the company knows about its users to create a shared understanding with the rest of the organization.
Which tool should the designer use?
An Empathy Map is a tool used in UX design to synthesize and articulate what a design team knows about a user group. It helps in creating a shared understanding of user needs within an organization. The key features of an Empathy Map include:
User Insights: It captures what users say, think, do, and feel, providing a holistic view of their experiences and perspectives. This helps in understanding users at a deeper level.
Shared Understanding: By visualizing user attitudes and behaviors, an Empathy Map facilitates a common understanding among team members and stakeholders, ensuring that design decisions are aligned with user needs.
An Executive Summary (option A) provides a high-level overview of project objectives and outcomes but does not delve into user-centric insights. Prioritizing a Backlog (option C) is more about organizing and prioritizing tasks and features rather than synthesizing user research findings.
Reference: For guidelines on creating and using Empathy Maps, UX design resources such as the Nielsen Norman Group and the Interaction Design Foundation offer articles and guides on this and other UX research synthesis tools. These resources explain how to effectively use Empathy Maps to gain insights into user needs and foster empathy within design teams.
