At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Salesforce Platform-App-Builder exam questions by Salesforce. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Salesforce Certified Platform App Builder exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Salesforce in their Salesforce Platform-App-Builder exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Salesforce Certified Platform App Builder exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Salesforce Platform-App-Builder exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Universal Containers has Public Read/Write as the Account organization-wide default (OWD) setting. Visitors to the customer community site report that they can see all of the company's account records.
How should an app builder configure Account sharing so that community users only see their own Account?
The best way to configure Account sharing so that community users only see their own Account is to set the account external OWD to private. This will restrict the access to Account records for external users based on the sharing rules and criteria. Creating an account record type, defining an owner-based sharing rule, or defining a permission set will not prevent community users from seeing other accounts.
An app builder wants to update a field on the parent record when a child record connected via lookup is deleted.
What automation should the app builder use?
The app builder should use Apex code to update a field on the parent record when a child record connected via lookup is deleted. Apex code is a programming language that allows developers to execute complex logic on the Salesforce platform. Apex code can be triggered by certain events, such as insert, update, delete, or undelete of records. In this case, the app builder can write an Apex trigger that runs after a child record is deleted and updates a field on the parent record accordingly. Option A, B, and D are not automation tools that can perform this task.
DreamHouse Realty (DHR) recently acquired Cloud Kicks (CK), a company that is still on Salesforce Classic. DHR is keeping the CK Salesforce org; however, it will migrate this org to Lightning Experience.
Where should the app builder find prebuilt resources to help with this project and overall adoption?
AppExchange is a marketplace where app builders can find prebuilt resources to help with migration and adoption projects. AppExchange offers apps, components, solutions, and consulting services that can assist with moving from Classic to Lightning Experience. Import Wizard, Lightning Object Creator, and Flow Builder are not sources of prebuilt resources, but tools for data import, object creation, and automation respectively.
An app builder needs to create new automation on an object.
What best practice should the app builder follow when building out automation?
The best practice that the app builder should follow when building out automation is one record change process per object. A record change process is a type of process in Process Builder that starts when a record is created or updated. Having one record change process per object can avoid conflicts or errors when multiple processes try to update the same record at the same time. Option A is incorrect because one workflow rule per object is not a best practice, as workflow rules are considered legacy tools and have limitations compared to Process Builder. Option B is incorrect because one flow per object is not a best practice, as flows are more complex and require more resources than processes. Option C is incorrect because one invocable process per object is not a best practice, as invocable processes are used to invoke other processes from within a process or a flow.
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) has created the custom objects Trail and Park in Salesforce to track trails and parks respectively. NTO wants to
track the total number of trails a park has on the park record without writing any code.
Which two actions should an app builder take to accomplish this requirement?
Choose 2 answers
To track the total number of trails associated with a park without writing code, the correct actions to take are:
Use a roll-up summary field on the Park record to show the total number of Trails (B). Roll-up summary fields calculate and display a value in a master record based on the values of fields in a detail record. They are used to count, sum, average, or get the minimum/maximum of values in related detail records.
Use a master-detail relationship between the Park and Trail objects (C). Master-detail relationships are necessary for roll-up summary fields as they allow the master object to control certain behaviors of the detail object and summarize data from those detail records.
A formula field (A) cannot dynamically count related records unless those records are linked via a master-detail relationship, and it cannot alone handle counts across related records without such a relationship. A lookup relationship (D) does not support roll-up summaries unless combined with additional tools like triggers or third-party apps, which involve coding or extra configuration outside standard object setup.
For more details, refer to the Salesforce Help documentation on master-detail relationships and roll-up summary fields:
