At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Salesforce Marketing-Cloud-Intelligence exam questions by Salesforce. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Salesforce in their Salesforce Marketing-Cloud-Intelligence exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Salesforce Marketing-Cloud-Intelligence exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
A client has provided you with sample files of their data from the following data sources:
1.Google Analytics
2.Salesforce Marketing Cloud
The link between these sources is on the following two fields:
Message Send Key
A portion of: web_site_source_key
Below is the logic the client would like to have implemented in Datorama:
For 'web site medium' values containing the word ''email'' (in all of its forms), the section after the ''_'' delimiter in 'web_site_source_key' is a 4 digit
number, which matches the 'Message Send Key' values from the Salesforce Marketing Cloud file. Possible examples of this can be seen in the
following table:
Google Analytics:
Salesforce Marketing Cloud:
The client's objective is to visualize the mutual key values alongside measurements from both files in a table.
In order to achieve this, what steps should be taken?
To create a linkage between Google Analytics and Salesforce Marketing Cloud data based on the 'Message Send Key' and a portion of the 'web_site_source_key,' both values need to be harmonized into a common key. This is done by mapping the full Message Send Key from Salesforce Marketing Cloud and the extracted part of the web_site_source_key from Google Analytics to the same Custom Classification Key. This mapping will create a common identifier that can be used to combine the data from both sources for analysis and visualization.
A client's data consists of three data streams as follows:
* The data streams should be linked together through a parent-child relationship.
* Out of the three data streams, Data Stream C is considered the source of truth for both the dimensions and measurements.
Which data stream should be set as a parent?
Since Data Stream C is considered the source of truth for both dimensions and measurements, it should be set as the parent data stream. This is because the parent data stream is used as the primary source for hierarchical and attribute data within a parent-child relationship setup. As the source of truth, Data Stream C will provide the foundational data upon which the other streams can be aligned and will ensure consistency and accuracy across the linked data.
An implementation engineer has been asked to perform QA for a standard file ingestion, done by the client.
The source file that was ingested can be seen below:
The number of rows added to this data stream is 3. What could have led to this discrepancy?
The source file shows data related to media buys, including a 'Media Buy Key', 'Media Buy Name', 'Campaign Key', and 'Site Key', among other fields. If only three rows were added, and the discrepancy is due to a missing field, it's likely that 'Campaign Key' is the field not mapped, because it is crucial for linking related records in the data stream. Without the 'Campaign Key', the system cannot associate the media buy data with specific campaigns, leading to a potential loss of data rows during ingestion.
Your client has provided sample files of their data from the following data sources:
Google Campaign Manager
Below are the requirements from the client and additional information:
* The sources are linked to each other by shared Media Buy names.
* In addition to the mutual Media Buys, the sources contain campaign and site values. However, the client would like to see the campaign/site values coming from Google CM and not from Google DV360.
* The source of truth for cost is Google DV360
Which action(s) are needed to take place in order to meet the client's requirement and set Google DV360 as the source of truth for Cost?
To set Google DV360 as the source of truth for cost:
The cost data from Google DV360 should be prioritized, which means ensuring that the 'Cost' field in Google Campaign Manager is not mapped or is mapped with less priority compared to Google DV360.
Given that DV360 is to be the source of truth, you do not want competing cost data from Campaign Manager. Unmapping 'Cost' in Google Campaign Manager prevents conflicting data between the two sources and upholds the integrity of the cost data coming from Google DV360.
What is the relationship between "Media Buy Key" and "Creative Key?
In Marketing Cloud Intelligence, the 'Media Buy Key' is typically associated with the purchase details of a media campaign, such as the platform, audience, and budget. The 'Creative Key' relates to the specific creative asset used within a campaign, like an image, video, or text. A single media buy can have multiple creative variations to test performance or to target different audiences, leading to a one-to-many relationship.
