At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Pure Storage FBAP_002 exam questions by Pure Storage. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Pure Storage Certified Architect Professional - FlashBlade exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Pure Storage in their Pure Storage FBAP_002 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Pure Storage Certified Architect Professional - FlashBlade exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Pure Storage FBAP_002 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
A customer map application is built with a containerized micro-service infrastructure that runs on Windows and accesses storage using SMB.
Each container is stateless, but every end user interaction leaves a set of small text and image files. Each directory keeps all daily transaction files. A process exists to manage file life cycle and periodically delete a directory.
The customer notices that as the customer base grows, the background deletion process backlog also grows. Which FlashBlade technology should be used to resolve this issue?
A customer need to analyze the performance data outside of Pure1 and Purity//FB.
Which two tasks should the customer perform? (Select two.)
A customer reports far lower than expected performance on the FlashBlade, in a Oracle RMAN backup solution. The environment consists of four Oracle database nodes, each with 1x10Gb/s NIC, connected via NFS, to a fully populated FlashBlade chassis. Only a small number of blades are being used. Synthetic performance testing shows no performance issues in the network.
What should the architect suggest to causing this issue?
An oil company moves geological data between their offices in Dubai and Houston for redundancy. The data is accessed via NFS mounts on a cluster of three 10GB connected Linux servers at each location.
A series of cron jobs are leveraged to replicate data from data storage pool A in Dubai to data storage B in Houston and from data storage A in Houston to data storage pool B in Dubai.
Data in storage pool A is read-write, updated by 50 cellular connected data collector running in the field, and deleted after 30 days.
Data in the storage pool B is read-only, queried by the firm's analytics team, and copied to a cloud-based archive repository every 30 days.
The total amount of data in pool A in Dubai is 1.5PB
The total amount of data in pool B in Houston is 500TB
The data is not expected to grow in the next 12 months and is compressed by the application.
Which configuration should the architect present to meet this customer needs?
A . A Multi-Chassis FlashBlade with 52TB blades for each site focusing on simplicity.
What is the total number of uplinks that can be utilized by the two XFMs, in any FlashBlade multi-chassis configuration?
