At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Palo Alto Networks SSE-Engineer exam questions by Palo Alto Networks. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Palo Alto Networks Security Service Edge Engineer exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Palo Alto Networks in their Palo Alto Networks SSE-Engineer exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Palo Alto Networks Security Service Edge Engineer exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Palo Alto Networks SSE-Engineer exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
What is the impact of selecting the ''Disable Server Response Inspection'' checkbox after confirming that a Security policy rule has a threat protection profile configured?
Selecting the ''Disable Server Response Inspection'' checkbox means that traffic flowing from the server to the client will not be inspected for threats, even if a threat protection profile is applied to the Security policy rule. This setting can reduce processing overhead but may expose the network to threats embedded in server responses, such as malware or exploits.
Which Cloud Identity Engine capability will create a Security policy that uses Entra ID attributes as the source identification?
The Cloud Dynamic User Group capability in Cloud Identity Engine enables the creation of Security policies that use Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) attributes for user identification. This allows Prisma Access to dynamically apply user-based security rules based on real-time Entra ID attributes, ensuring that access policies adapt to user changes such as group membership, device compliance, or role updates.
When using the traffic replication feature in Prisma Access, where is the mirrored traffic directed for analysis?
Palo Alto Networks documentation clearly states that when configuring the traffic replication feature in Prisma Access, you must specify an internal security appliance as the destination for the mirrored traffic. This appliance, typically a Palo Alto Networks next-generation firewall or a third-party security tool, is responsible for receiving and analyzing the replicated traffic for various purposes like threat analysis, troubleshooting, or compliance monitoring.
Let's analyze why the other options are incorrect based on official documentation:
B . Dedicated cloud storage location: While Prisma Access logs and other data might be stored in the cloud, the mirrored traffic for real-time analysis is directly streamed to a designated security appliance, not a passive storage location.
C . Panorama: Panorama is the centralized management system for Palo Alto Networks firewalls. While Panorama can receive logs and manage the configuration of Prisma Access, it is not the direct destination for real-time mirrored traffic intended for immediate analysis.
D . Strata Cloud Manager (SCM): Strata Cloud Manager is the platform used to configure and manage Prisma Access. It facilitates the setup of traffic replication, including specifying the destination appliance, but it does not directly receive or analyze the mirrored traffic itself.
Therefore, the mirrored traffic from the traffic replication feature in Prisma Access is directed to a specified internal security appliance for analysis.
Which statement applies when enabling multitenancy in Prisma Access (Managed by Panorama)?
When multitenancy is enabled in Prisma Access (Managed by Panorama), a key characteristic is the isolation of resources between tenants. Palo Alto Networks documentation emphasizes that each tenant operates within its own logically separate Prisma Access environment. This includes dedicated compute instances, ensuring that the performance and security of one tenant are not impacted by the activities of another.
Let's analyze why the other options are incorrect based on official documentation:
A . Service connection licenses will be assigned only to the first tenant, and these service connections can be shared with the other tenants. This statement is incorrect. In a multitenant Prisma Access deployment, licenses are typically managed and allocated per tenant. While the underlying infrastructure might be shared by Palo Alto Networks, the logical resources and often the licensing are segmented for each tenant. Sharing service connections across completely separate tenants would violate the principle of tenant isolation.
B . A single tenant cannot consist solely of mobile users or solely of remote networks. This statement is incorrect. Prisma Access multitenancy allows for flexibility in how tenants are configured. A tenant can be designed to exclusively serve mobile users, exclusively connect remote networks, or a combination of both, depending on the organizational structure and requirements.
D . There is flexibility to manage different tenants using separate Panoramas, which allows for better organization and management of the multiple tenants. While it is possible to have multiple Panorama instances managing different parts of a large infrastructure, when discussing multitenancy within a single Prisma Access instance (as implied by the question 'enabling multitenancy in Prisma Access (Managed by Panorama))', all configured tenants are managed by that single Panorama instance. Managing different tenants with separate Panoramas is a different architectural consideration, not a defining characteristic of enabling multitenancy within one Prisma Access deployment managed by a specific Panorama.
Therefore, the defining characteristic of Prisma Access multitenancy (Managed by Panorama) is the allocation of dedicated Prisma Access instances and compute resources for each tenant, ensuring logical separation and resource isolation
How can role-based access control (RBAC) for Prisma Access (Managed by Strata Cloud Manager) be used to grant each member of a security team full administrative access to manage the Security policy in a single tenant while restricting access to other tenants in a multitenant deployment?
In a multitenant deployment, access control must be configured at the Child Tenant level to ensure that security administrators have full control over Security policy only within their assigned tenant while restricting access to other tenants. By selecting Prisma Access & NGFW Configuration, the assigned users gain full administrative access only for security policy management within the designated tenant, aligning with RBAC best practices for controlled access in Prisma Access Managed by Strata Cloud Manager.
