A company plans to set up a local Business Central Development Docker container. The environment will be used for testing new project ideas.
You need to ensure that the most recent Business Central artifact URL has been selected. Which command should you use?
To ensure the most recent Business Central artifact URL is selected for setting up a local Business Central Development Docker container, the command to use is Get-BcArtifactUrl -type sandbox -select Current (A). This PowerShell command retrieves the URL for the latest available Business Central artifact for a sandbox environment, ensuring that the Docker container is set up with the most up-to-date version for testing new project ideas. The -select Current parameter is crucial as it specifies that the current, or latest, version of the artifact is to be retrieved, as opposed to selecting a version based on other criteria such as Closest, NextMinor, or NextMajor.
A company has a Business Central online environment.
You need to create an HTTP GET request that connects to an external REST service.
Which solution should you use?
To create an HTTP GET request that connects to an external REST service in a Business Central online environment, the solution to use is the HttpClient data type variable (E). The HttpClient data type in AL language is designed for sending HTTP requests and receiving HTTP responses from a resource identified by a URI. This makes it the ideal choice for interfacing with external REST services, as it provides the necessary methods and properties to configure and execute HTTP GET requests, handle the responses, and process the data returned by the REST service. This approach is more direct and flexible compared to using specific codeunits like 'Web Request Helper' (B) or 'Http Web Request Mgt' (D), which might not provide the same level of control or specificity needed for RESTful interactions.
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear on the review screen.
A company creates a Business Central app and a table named MyTable to store records when sales orders are posted.
Users report the following issues:
* The users receive permission errors related lo MyTable.
* Users are no longer able to post sales orders since installing the new app.
* The users cannot access the list page created in MyTable.
You need to resolve the user issues without creating new permission sets. You must use the principle of least privilege.
Solution: In the MyTable object add the property InherentPermissions = Rl. Does the solution meet the goal?
The property InherentPermissions is used to automatically grant permissions to the table object it is applied to, but setting it to Rl (which seems to be a typo and should likely be 'RL' for Read and Insert permissions) is not sufficient in this scenario. The issues reported by the users suggest that they need more than just read and insert permissions on MyTable. Since users are unable to post sales orders, they likely need Modify, Delete, or Execute permissions on certain tables or objects related to the sales order process. Additionally, the inability to access the list page created in MyTable could be due to lacking Read permissions on other related objects or pages. Therefore, merely setting InherentPermissions = RL on MyTable does not comprehensively address the users' permission issues, especially when considering the principle of least privilege. A more tailored approach to permissions, potentially involving adjustments to the app's code or configuration to ensure proper permissions are applied where necessary, would be needed.
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear on the review screen.
A company creates a Business Central app and a table named MyTable to store records when sales orders are posted.
Users report the following issues:
* The users receive permission errors related to MyTable.
* Users are no longer able to post sales orders since installing the new app.
* The users cannot access the list page created in MyTable.
You need to resolve the user issues without creating new permission sets. You must use the principle of least privilege.
Solution: Assign a SUPER permission set.
Does the solution meet the goal?
Assigning a SUPER permission set to all users would indeed resolve the permission errors and access issues reported by the users, as it grants full permissions across all objects and data in Business Central. However, this approach contradicts the principle of least privilege, which advocates for providing only the minimum levels of access necessary for users to perform their jobs. The SUPER permission set would excessively elevate user privileges, potentially leading to security risks and unintended modifications to critical data. Therefore, while assigning the SUPER permission set might technically resolve the immediate issues, it does not meet the goal of adhering to the principle of least privilege and is not a recommended solution.
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question set might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear on the review screen.
A company creates a Business Central app and a table named MyTable to store records when sales orders are posted.
Users report the following issues:
* The users receive permission errors related to MyTable.
* Users are no longer able to post sales orders since installing the new app.
* The users cannot access the list page created in MyTable.
You need to resolve the user issues without creating new permission sets. You must use the principle of least privilege.
Solution: Decorate the event subscriber used for inserting data in MyTable by entering (lnherentPermissions(PermissionOb]ectType:TableDat
a. Database:MyTable. 'R')]
Does the solution meet the goal?
Using InherentPermissions in an event subscriber with the specified syntax could potentially resolve the permission issues related to MyTable, provided that the permissions specified (in this case, 'R' for Read) align with the minimum necessary for the users to perform their tasks. This approach allows the app to grant permissions dynamically based on the context of the event subscriber, which in this case is involved with inserting data into MyTable. By granting Read permission at the event level, it ensures that users have the necessary permissions to interact with MyTable in the context of the operations facilitated by the event subscriber, without needing to alter existing permission sets or grant broader permissions than necessary. This solution adheres to the principle of least privilege by ensuring that permissions are granted only within the narrow scope needed for specific operations, thereby potentially resolving the reported user issues in a secure and controlled manner.
