At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Microsoft AZ-204 exam questions by Microsoft. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Microsoft Developing Solutions for Microsoft Azure Exam exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Microsoft in their Microsoft AZ-204 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Microsoft Developing Solutions for Microsoft Azure Exam exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Microsoft AZ-204 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
You are developing a microservices-based application that uses Azure Container Apps. The application consists of several containerized services that handle tasks, such as processing orders, managing inventory, and generating reports. You deploy a new revision of the processing orders app.
Processing orders must be triggered by a web request and must always be available based on incoming web requests.
You need to validate that the replica is ready to handle incoming requests.
What should you implement?
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this question, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You are developing a website that will run as an Azure Web App. Users will authenticate by using their Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) credentials.
You plan to assign users one of the following permission levels for the website: admin, normal, and reader. A user's Azure AD group membership must be used to determine the permission level. You need to configure authorization.
Solution:
*Create a new Azure AD application's manifest, set value of the groupMembershipClaims option to All.
*In the website, use the value of the groups claim from the JWI for the user to determine permissions.
Does the solution meet the goal?
To configure Manifest to include Group Claims in Auth Token
1. Go to Azure Active Directory to configure the Manifest. Click on Azure Active Directory, and go to App registrations to find your application:
2. Click on your application (or search for it if you have a lot of apps) and edit the Manifest by clicking on it.
3. Locate the ''groupMembershipClaims'' setting. Set its value to either ''SecurityGroup'' or ''All''. To help you decide which:
''SecurityGroup'' - groups claim will contain the identifiers of all security groups of which the user is a member.
''All'' - groups claim will contain the identifiers of all security groups and all distribution lists of which the user is a member
Now your application will include group claims in your manifest and you can use this fact in your code.
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/waws/2017/03/13/azure-app-service-authentication-aad-groups/
You develop a REST API. You implement a user delegation SAS token to communicate with Azure Blob
storage.
The token is compromised.
You need to revoke the token.
What are two possible ways to achieve this goal? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
A: Revoke a user delegation SAS
To revoke a user delegation SAS from the Azure CLI, call the az storage account revoke-delegation-keys command. This command revokes all of the user delegation keys associated with the specified storage account. Any shared access signatures associated with those keys are invalidated.
B: To revoke a stored access policy, you can either delete it, or rename it by changing the signed identifier.
Changing the signed identifier breaks the associations between any existing signatures and the stored access policy. Deleting or renaming the stored access policy immediately effects all of the shared access signatures associated with it.
D18912E1457D5D1DDCBD40AB3BF70D5D
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/master/articles/storage/blobs/storage-blob-user-delegationsas-create-cli.md
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/define-stored-access-policy#modifying-or-revoking-astored-access-policy
You develop and deploy an ASP.NET web app to Azure App Service. You use Application Insights telemetry to monitor the app.
You must test the app to ensure that the app is available and responsive from various points around the world
and at regular intervals. If the app is not responding, you must send an alert to support staff.
You need to configure a test for the web app.
Which two test types can you use? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
There are three types of availability tests:
URL ping test: a simple test that you can create in the Azure portal.
Multi-step web test: A recording of a sequence of web requests, which can be played back to test more complex scenarios. Multi-step web tests are created in Visual Studio Enterprise and uploaded to the portal for execution.
Custom Track Availability Tests: If you decide to create a custom application to run availability tests, the TrackAvailability() method can be used to send the results to Application Insights.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/app/monitor-web-app-availability
You have an Azure App Service plan named APSPIanl set to the Basic B1 pricing tier. APSPIanl contains an App Service web app named WebAppl. You plan lo enable schedule-based autoscaling for APSPIanl. You need to minimize the cost of running WebAppl.
Solution: Scale out APSPIan1.
Does the solution meet the goal?
