Key details for this exam, checked against the published exam outline
Each question shows the correct answer and an explanation of why it is right
Click the Exhibit button.

Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
The show ospf interface output provides critical information about the local OSPF state.
Loopback Behavior (Option A): The output shows lo0.0 is in the DR (Designated Router) state with Nbrs 0. In Junos OS, OSPF adjacencies are not formed over loopback interfaces; they are treated as stub networks.
Neighbor State (Option D): Every interface listed (ge-0/0/1.0, ge-0/0/2.0, and lo0.0) shows Nbrs 0. This indicates that the router is not seeing any OSPF neighbors. Since the physical interfaces are in the DR state (meaning the router has elected itself as the DR because no other routers responded), it confirms the router is not receiving OSPF Hello messages from any potential neighbors on those segments.
Router ID: The DR ID 192.168.1.17 is the local router's own ID, not a neighbor it is trying to reach.
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)
The exhibit shows the Class of Service (CoS) transmit queue information for interface ge-0/0/11. To determine the correct behavior, we must analyze the bandwidth allocations and the queue limit settings:
Bandwidth Calculation (Option A): In Junos OS, when multiple queues are assigned specific percentages of bandwidth, the 'remainder' (represented by 'r') is the total interface bandwidth minus the sum of the explicitly configured percentages.
Bandwidth assigned to Queue 1 (EF) = 10%.
Bandwidth assigned to Queue 2 (AF) = 10%.
Bandwidth assigned to Queue 3 (NC) = 4%.
Total explicitly assigned = $10\% + 10\% + 4\% = 24\%$.
Remainder for Queue 0 (Best Effort) = $100\% - 24\% = 76\%$.
'Limit: exact' Behavior (Option B): The exhibit shows that Queue 2 (assured-forwarding) has a Limit set to exact.
By default, a queue in Junos can consume more than its allocated bandwidth if other queues are idle.
However, when the exact keyword is applied to the transmit-rate (transmission rate), the queue is strictly rate-limited to its configured percentage.
This means that traffic in Queue 2 will be capped at 10% of the interface bandwidth regardless of whether the network is congested or not. If the traffic exceeds 10%, the excess will be dropped or buffered to match the exact rate.
Option C is incorrect because 100% of the bandwidth is not reserved for a single queue; it is distributed across four queues.
Option D is less accurate than B because it implies the drop behavior only occurs during congestion. The exact parameter enforces the limit even when the rest of the interface is completely idle.
Which statement accurately describes the operation of OSPF within the Junos OS?
OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) is a standards-based Link-State Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) implemented within Junos OS 24.4:
Intra-AS Routing: OSPF is designed to distribute routing information and perform neighbor discovery within a single Autonomous System (AS). It divides the AS into areas to localize Link-State Advertisements (LSAs) and reduce the size of the Link-State Database (LSDB) on each router. (Option B)
Algorithm: OSPF uses the Shortest Path First (SPF) or Dijkstra algorithm, not a distance vector algorithm (which would be RIP or BGP). This makes Option A incorrect.
Directly Connected Routes: In Junos OS, you must explicitly configure an interface under the [edit protocols ospf] hierarchy to include it in the OSPF process. Once an interface is added, its prefix is automatically advertised to neighbors via Router (Type 1) LSAs. This makes Option C technically inaccurate in the context of interfaces participating in the protocol.
Scope: Protocols used between multiple autonomous systems are External Gateway Protocols (EGPs), such as BGP. This makes Option D incorrect.
Exhibit.

You have determined that traffic in your network is being routed through your route reflector instead of using the optimal path. Referring to the exhibit, what are two configuration changes on the route reflector that would solve the problem? (Choose two.)
The exhibit shows a BGP Route Reflector (RR) configuration where an export policy named NHS (Next-Hop Self) is applied to the internal BGP group int-group. The policy NHS sets the next-hop self attribute for BGP routes.
The Problem (Traffic Tromboning): In a standard BGP Route Reflector design, the RR should reflect routes without modifying the BGP next-hop attribute. By applying a next-hop self policy on the export to clients, the RR tells all its clients that it is the exit point for those routes. Consequently, all data plane traffic is sent to the RR first before being forwarded to the actual destination, rather than following the optimal direct path between clients. This is known as 'traffic tromboning' or suboptimal routing.
The Solution (Option C): The most direct way to fix this is to delete the export policy that is forcing the next-hop to be the RR. By deleting protocols bgp group int-group export NHS, the RR will resume standard behavior and reflect the original next-hop received from the route source, allowing clients to route traffic directly to the correct destination.
The Refined Solution (Option D): If you must keep the NHS policy (perhaps for routes learned from external peers), you should ensure it only applies to those specific routes. By adding from route-type internal to the policy term and then potentially changing the logic (or simply narrowing the scope), you can prevent the RR from incorrectly applying next-hop self to internal routes that it is merely reflecting. In the context of this specific problem, Option D combined with a change in the policy's action or scope helps ensure reflected internal routes maintain their original, optimal next-hops.
Option A is incorrect because setting next-hop self for external routes is common practice, but it doesn't solve the problem of internal reflected routes being diverted to the RR.
Option B is incorrect because applying this as an import policy would change how the RR itself sees the routes, but it wouldn't fix the attributes being sent out to the clients in the reflection process.
You are deploying IP phones in your enterprise networks. When plugged in. the IP phones must automatically be provided with their geographic location details by the EX Series switches.
In this scenario, which protocol should be used to enable this behavior?
To provide IP phones with geographic location details (such as civic addresses or coordinates) automatically, Juniper EX Series switches utilize the LLDP-MED (Link Layer Discovery Protocol - Media Endpoint Discovery) protocol.
VoIP Specifics: While standard LLDP (C) is for general device discovery, LLDP-MED is an enhancement specifically designed for network-to-endpoint communication for VoIP devices.
Location Identification: LLDP-MED supports Location Identification TLVs (Type-Length-Values). These allow a switch to push geographic or civic location data to an IP phone, which is critical for E911 services and asset tracking.
Junos Implementation: On EX Series switches, this is typically configured under protocols lldp-med to ensure the switch advertises the necessary location information to connected endpoints.
72 questions covering all exam domains, starting from $20
Exam domains verified against: Official Juniper JN0-650 exam guide, last checked August 2026.
Understand the operation and configuration of OSPF and IS-IS in enterprise networks. Troubleshooting IGPs requires deep knowledge of link-state fundamentals and routing policy application to control protocol behavior across large deployments.
Master BGP route selection, next hop resolution, and community-based attribute manipulation. Advanced BGP scenarios demand hands-on troubleshooting of path selection issues and policy implementation in multi-AS environments.
Sample question from this domain above: Q4
Learn PIM-SM operation, RP election, MSDP, and IGMP configuration from first principles. Many candidates struggle with multicast RPF logic and source-to-RP discovery. practice with live tree state debugging is essential.
Configure and monitor advanced VLANs, MSTP or VSTP, and Layer 2 tunneling. Understanding filter-based VLAN binding and Q-in-Q encapsulation requires hands-on lab work beyond reading documentation.
Implement 802.1x, MAC RADIUS, captive portal, and guest VLAN fallback mechanisms. Real-world scenarios test your ability to diagnose authentication state machine failures and server integration issues.
Configure Power over Ethernet, LLDP-MED, and voice VLAN to support unified communications deployments. Exam questions test both the configuration commands and the protocol discovery process used by IP phones.
Sample question from this domain above: Q5
Design and troubleshoot CoS policies covering classification, queuing, dropping, and shaping across Layer 2 and 3 networks. CoS requires strong understanding of packet header fields and forwarding class manipulation throughout the pipeline.
Sample question from this domain above: Q2
Deploy VXLAN with EVPN route types and multi-homing in data center or campus fabrics. Configuration scenarios test your ability to integrate EVPN with BGP and validate MAC and IP reachability across VXLAN overlays.
Common questions about the exam itself