At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Isaca COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam questions by Isaca. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Isaca ISACA COBIT Design and Implementation Certificate exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Isaca in their Isaca COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Isaca ISACA COBIT Design and Implementation Certificate exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Isaca COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Which of the following is the PRIMARY benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes?
The primary benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes is the identification of process improvement opportunities. This analysis helps to pinpoint specific areas where processes can be enhanced to achieve the desired capability levels.
Setting targeted capability levels and conducting a capability-level gap analysis allows an enterprise to:
Identify gaps between current and desired process capabilities.
Highlight areas where processes are underperforming.
Prioritize improvement initiatives to close these gaps.
COBIT 2019 Framework Reference:
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2: Discusses the use of capability levels and gap analysis to identify and prioritize process improvement opportunities.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 5: Provides guidance on conducting capability-level gap analyses to drive process improvements.
By identifying process improvement opportunities through capability-level gap analysis, the enterprise can systematically enhance its processes, leading to better performance and alignment with business objectives.
An enterprise has been consistently growing over the years and has decided to adapt the COBIT framework from the growth perspective of the balanced scorecard dimensions. Which of the following enterprise goals is MOST relevant to select?
The COBIT 2019 framework aligns enterprise goals with balanced scorecard (BSC) dimensions. Under the growth and innovation BSC perspective, one of the core enterprise goals listed is:
'Product and business innovation' -- which directly supports strategic growth by encouraging new products, services, and ways of operating.
This goal aligns with an enterprise that is expanding and looking to leverage innovation to sustain growth. Other options like risk management or cost optimization fit different BSC dimensions (e.g., financial, internal process).
Which of the following should be a KEY consideration for an enterprise when refining the scope of the governance system in the third stage of the Governance System Design Workflow?
In the third stage of the Governance System Design Workflow, refining the scope of the governance system involves aligning it closely with the overall strategic direction and objectives of the enterprise. COBIT 2019 emphasizes that the governance system should support the enterprise's strategy to ensure that I&T-related activities contribute effectively to achieving business goals.
Key considerations for refining the scope include:
Enterprise Strategy (Option A): The primary consideration is ensuring that the governance system aligns with and supports the enterprise strategy. This involves understanding the strategic objectives, goals, and priorities of the organization and ensuring that the governance system is designed to help achieve these strategic aims. This alignment ensures that IT governance is not just a compliance exercise but a strategic enabler for business success.
Current I&T-Related Risks (Option B): While important, this factor is more about addressing immediate operational concerns and is typically considered earlier in the process to identify and mitigate significant risks.
The Risk Profile (Option C): Understanding the overall risk profile and risk appetite of the enterprise is crucial for shaping the governance system but is not the primary focus in the third stage. This aspect is usually addressed in earlier stages to ensure that the governance framework adequately covers risk management.
Compliance Requirements (Option D): Ensuring compliance is always a critical consideration, but like risk management, it is typically addressed earlier in the design process. Compliance requirements should be integrated into the governance framework but are not the key driver at the refining stage.
Thus, the correct answer is A. Enterprise strategy. By focusing on the enterprise strategy during the third stage of the Governance System Design Workflow, the governance system can be refined to support strategic initiatives, thereby ensuring that IT governance contributes directly to achieving business goals.
ISACA. COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.
ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
Which of the following is the BEST approach when developing an EGIT implementation program plan?
When developing an EGIT (Enterprise Governance of IT) implementation program plan, the best approach is to select projects that are high-benefit and relatively easy to implement first. This approach, often referred to as 'low-hanging fruit,' helps build momentum, demonstrate value quickly, and secure buy-in from stakeholders for more complex initiatives.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 5: This chapter outlines the importance of prioritizing projects that can deliver quick wins to maintain stakeholder support and demonstrate the value of the governance framework.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI01 (Managed Programs): This objective discusses the prioritization of initiatives based on their potential benefits and implementation feasibility.
By focusing on high-benefit, easy-to-implement projects, enterprises can create a solid foundation for more challenging initiatives and ensure continuous progress in their governance implementation efforts.
When considering the technology adoption strategy design factor, and the design factor value is first mover, which of the following should be a governance objective priority?
According to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide:
'A first mover in technology adoption will prioritize benefits realization, ensuring that the value from early adoption is achieved effectively.'
Thus, Ensured benefits delivery (EDM02) aligns best with a first-mover approach.
