At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Isaca CISA exam questions by Isaca. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Isaca Certified Information Systems Auditor exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Isaca in their Isaca CISA exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Isaca Certified Information Systems Auditor exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Isaca CISA exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
When planning an audit to assess application controls of a cloud-based system, it is MOST important tor the IS auditor to understand the.
The business process supported by the system is the most important factor for an IS auditor to understand when planning an audit to assess application controls of a cloud-based system. An IS auditor should have a clear understanding of the business objectives, requirements, and risks of the process, as well as the expected outputs and outcomes of the system. This will help the IS auditor to determine the scope, objectives, and criteria of the audit, as well as to identify and evaluate the key application controls that ensure the effectiveness, efficiency, and reliability of the process. The other options are less important factors that may provide additional information or context for the audit, but not its primary focus.Reference:
CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 5,Section 5.31
CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID 212
The following findings are the result of an IS auditor's post-implementation review of a newly implemented system. Which of the following findings is of GREATEST significance?
A post-implementation review (PIR) is a process to evaluate whetherthe objectives of the project were met, determine how effectively this wasachieved, learn lessons for the future, and ensure that the organisation gets the most benefit from the implementation of projects1. A PIR is an important tool for assessing the success and value of a project, as well as identifying the areas for improvement and best practices for future projects.
One of the key elements of a PIR is to measure the benefits of the project against the expected outcomes and benefits that were defined at the beginning of the project.Measurable benefits are the quantifiable and verifiable results or outcomes that the project delivers to theorganisation or its stakeholders, such as increased revenue, reduced costs, improved quality, enhanced customer satisfaction, or compliance with regulations2. Measurable benefits should be aligned with the organisation's strategy, vision, and goals, and should be SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound).
The finding that measurable benefits were not defined is of greatest significance among the four findings, because it implies that:
The project did not have a clear and agreed-upon purpose, scope, objectives, and deliverables
The project did not have a valid and realistic business case or justification for its initiation and implementation
The project did not have a robust and effective monitoring and evaluation mechanism to track its progress, performance, and impact
The project did not have a reliable and transparent way to demonstrate its value proposition and return on investment to the organisation or its stakeholders
The project did not have a meaningful and actionable way to learn from its achievements and challenges, and to improve its processes and practices
Therefore, an IS auditor should recommend that measurable benefits are defined for any project before its implementation, and that they are reviewed and reported regularly during and after the project's completion.
The other possible findings are:
A lessons-learned session was never conducted: This is a significant finding, but not as significant as the lack of measurable benefits. A lessons-learned session is a process of capturing and documenting the knowledge, experience, and feedback gained from a project, both positive and negative. A lessons-learned session helps to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the project management process, as well as the best practices and lessons for future projects. A lessons-learned session should be conducted at the end of each project phase or milestone, as well as at the end of the project. However, even without a formal lessons-learned session, some learning may still occur informally or implicitly among the project team members or stakeholders.
The projects 10% budget overrun was not reported to senior management: This is a significant finding, but not as significant as the lack of measurable benefits. A budget overrun is a situation where the actual cost of a project exceeds its planned or estimated cost. A budget overrun may indicate poor planning, estimation, or control of the project resources, or unexpected changes or risks that occurred during the project implementation. A budget overrun should be reported to senior management as soon as possible, along with the reasons for it and the corrective actions taken or proposed. However, a budget overrun may not necessarily affect the quality or value of the project deliverables or outcomes if they are still within acceptable standards or expectations.
Monthly dashboards did not always contain deliverables: This is a significant finding, but not as significant as the lack of measurable benefits. A dashboard is a visual tool that displays key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics related to a project's progress, status, or results. A dashboard helps to monitor and communicate the performance of a project to various stakeholders in a concise and clear manner. A dashboard should include deliverables as one of its components, along with other elements such as schedule, budget, quality, risks, issues, or benefits. However, even without deliverables in monthly dashboards, some information about them may still be available from other sources such as reports or documents.
An IS auditor observes that a business-critical application does not currently have any level of fault tolerance. Which of the following is the GREATEST concern with this situation?
The greatest concern with this situation is that a business-critical application does not currently have any level of fault tolerance and thus has a single point of failure. A single point of failure is a component or element of a system that, if it fails, will cause the entire system to stop functioning. Fault tolerance is the ability of a system to continue operating without interruption or degradation in the event of a failure of one or more of its components or elements. Fault tolerance can be achieved by using techniques such as redundancy, replication, backup, or failover. A business-critical application should have a high level of fault tolerance to ensure its availability, reliability, and continuity.Reference:
CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 5, Section 5.51
CISA Online Review Course,Domain 3, Module 3, Lesson 22
Which of the following is the BEST way to help ensure new IT implementations align with enterprise architecture (EA) principles and requirements?
The best way to help ensure new IT implementations align with enterprise architecture (EA) principles and requirements is to conduct EA reviews as part of the change advisory board (CAB). A CAB is a committee that evaluates and authorizes changes to IT services, such as new IT implementations. By conducting EA reviews as part of the CAB process, the organization can ensure that the proposed changes are consistent with the EA vision, goals, standards, and guidelines. This can help avoid potential conflicts, risks, or inefficiencies that may arise from misaligned IT implementations. Additionally, EA reviews can help identify opportunities for improvement, optimization, or innovation in the IT services.
The other options are not the best ways to help ensure new IT implementations align with EA principles and requirements. Documenting the security view as part of the EA is important, but it does not guarantee that new IT implementations will follow the security requirements or best practices. Considering stakeholder concerns when defining the EA is also essential, but it does not ensure that new IT implementations will meet the stakeholder expectations or needs. Performing mandatory post-implementation reviews of IT implementations is a good practice, but it does not prevent potential issues or problems that may arise from misaligned IT implementations.
5: Change Advisory Board Best Practices: 15+ Industry Leaders Weigh In
6: What Does the Change Advisory Board (CAB) Do?
7: How do I set up an effective change advisory board? - ServiceNow
8: ITIL Change Management - The Role of the Change Advisory Board
An IS auditor concludes that logging and monitoring mechanisms within an organization are ineffective because critical servers are not included within the central log repository. Which of the following audit procedures would have MOST likely identified this exception?
The audit procedure that would have most likely identified the exception of critical servers not included in the central log repository is to compare a list of all servers from the directory server against a list of all servers present in the central log repository. This would allow the IS auditor to detect any discrepancies or omissions in the central log repository. The other audit procedures (A, C and D) would not be effective in identifying this exception, as they would only focus on the alerts generated, the alert settings configured, or the servers included in the previous year's audit, which may not reflect the current state of the central log repository.Reference:IS Audit and Assurance Guideline 2202: Evidence Collection Techniques,CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 5: Protection of Information Assets, Section 5.3: Logging and Monitoring
