At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Isaca CISA exam questions by Isaca. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions, objectives, focus areas or requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these up to date and 100% exam domain coverage questions, our customers can successfully pass the Isaca Certified Information Systems Auditor exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Isaca in their CISA exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Isaca Certified Information Systems Auditor exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions. Our main priority is your success in the Isaca CISA exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Using swipe cards to limit employee access to restricted areas requires implementing which additional control?
Periodic review of access profiles by management is an additional control that is required when using swipe cards to limit employee access to restricted areas. Swipe cards are a type of physical access control that use magnetic stripes or radio frequency identification (RFID) to store and transmit information about the cardholder's identity and access rights. Swipe cards can help to prevent unauthorized entry, protect sensitive assets and data, and monitor access activity. However, swipe cards alone are not enough to ensure effective access control. They need to be complemented by other controls, such as:
Periodic review of access profiles by management: This is a type of logical access control that involves verifying that the access rights assigned to each cardholder are appropriate, necessary, and consistent with the organization's policies and procedures. Periodic review of access profiles can help to detect and correct any errors, inconsistencies, or violations in the access control system, such as outdated, excessive, or redundant access rights, segregation of duties conflicts, or unauthorized changes. Periodic review of access profiles can also help to ensure compliance with internal and external audit requirements and regulations.
Implementation of additional PIN pads: This is a type of multi-factor authentication (MFA) that requires the cardholder to enter a personal identification number (PIN) in addition to swiping their card. MFA can enhance the security of the access control system by adding another layer of verificationand reducing the risk of lost, stolen, or cloned cards being used by unauthorized persons.
Installation of closed-circuit television (CCTV): This is a type of surveillance system that uses cameras and monitors to record and display the images of the people and activities in the restricted areas. CCTV can deter potential intruders, provide evidence of any security incidents or breaches, and enable real-time monitoring and response by security personnel.
The other options are not as effective or relevant as periodic review of access profiles by management for an additional control when using swipe cards. Physical sign-in of all employees for access to restricted areas is a redundant and inefficient control that can be easily bypassed or manipulated. It also does not provide any assurance or verification of the identity or access rights of the cardholders. Audit hooks are software routines embedded in an application that can trigger an alert or a report when certain conditions are met. Audit hooks can help to detect anomalies or exceptions in access control lists, but they do not provide a comprehensive or integrated view of them.
ISACA, CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, 2019, p. 236
ISACA, ITAF: A Professional Practices Framework for IS Audit/Assurance, 3rd Edition, 2014, p. 88
Data Analytics for Auditing Access Control
Which of the following practices associated with capacity planning provides the GREATEST assurance that future incidents related to existing server performance will be prevented?
Which of the following is the GREATEST advantage of vulnerability scanning over penetration testing?
The greatest advantage of vulnerability scanning over penetration testing is that the testing process can be automated to cover large groups of assets. Vulnerability scanning is an automated, high-level security test that reports its findings of known vulnerabilities in systems, networks, applications, and devices. Vulnerability scanning can be performed frequently, quickly, and efficiently to scan a large number of assets and identify potential weaknesses that need to be addressed.Vulnerability scanning can also help organizations comply with security standards and regulations, such as PCI DSS1.
The other options are not as advantageous as option D, as they may not reflect the true benefits or limitations of vulnerability scanning compared to penetration testing. The testing produces a lower number of false positive results, but this is not necessarily true, as vulnerability scanning may report vulnerabilities that are not exploitable or relevant in the context of the organization. Network bandwidth is utilized more efficiently, but this may not be a significant advantage, as vulnerability scanning may still consume considerable network resources depending on the scope and frequency of the scans. Custom-developed applications can be tested more accurately, but this is also not true, as vulnerability scanning may not be able to detect complex or unknown vulnerabilities that require manual analysis or exploitation.
1: Vulnerability scanning vs penetration testing: What's the difference? | TechRepublic
2: Vulnerability Scanning vs. Penetration Testing - Fortinet
3: Penetration Test Vs Vulnerability Scan | Digital Defense
4: Penetration Testing vs. Vulnerability Scanning: What's the difference?
5: Penetration Testing vs. Vulnerability Scanning | Secureworks
6: PCI DSS Quick Reference Guide - PCI Security Standards Council
Which of the following would be the BEST process for continuous auditing to a large financial Institution?
The best process for continuous auditing for a large financial institution is validating access controls for real-time data systems. This is because access controls are critical for ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the financial data that is processed and transmitted by the real-time data systems. Real-time data systems are systems that provide timely and accurate information to support decision-making and transactions in a dynamic and complex environment. Examples of real-time data systems in the financial sector include payment systems, trading platforms, risk management systems, and fraud detection systems. Continuous auditing of access controls can help detect and prevent unauthorized access, data leakage, data manipulation, or data loss that could compromise the security, reliability, or compliance of the real-time data systems.
Testing encryption standards on the disaster recovery system is not the best process for continuous auditing for a large financial institution. Encryption standards are important for protecting the data stored or transmitted by the disaster recovery system, which is a system that provides backup and recovery capabilities in case of a disruption or disaster. However, testing encryption standards is not a continuous process, but rather a periodic or event-driven process that can be performed as part of the disaster recovery plan testing or validation.
Performing parallel testing between systems is not the best process for continuous auditing for a large financial institution. Parallel testing is a process of comparing the results of two or more systems that perform the same function or task, such as a new system and an old system, or a primary system and a backup system. Parallel testing can help verify the accuracy, consistency, and compatibility of the systems. However, parallel testing is not a continuous process, but rather a temporary or transitional process that can be performed as part of the system implementation or migration.
Validating performance of help desk metrics is not the best process for continuous auditing for a large financial institution. Help desk metrics are indicators that measure the efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of the help desk service, which is a service that provides technical support and assistance to the users of information systems and technology. Help desk metrics can include metrics such as response time, resolution time, customer satisfaction, and service level agreement (SLA) compliance. Validating performance of help desk metrics can help evaluate and improve the help desk service. However, validating performance of help desk metrics is not a continuous auditing process, but rather a continuous monitoring process that can be performed by the help desk management or quality assurance team.
All eyes on: Continuous auditing - KPMG Global1
Internal audit's role at financial institutions: PwC2
The Fed - Supervisory Policy and Guidance Topics - Large Banking ...3
Continuous Audit: Definition, Steps, Advantages and Disadvantages4
Which of the following would be an appropriate role of internal audit in helping to establish an organization's privacy program?
An appropriate role of internal audit in helping to establish an organization's privacy program is analyzing risks posed by new regulations. A privacy program is a set of policies, procedures, and controls that aim to protect the personal data of individuals from unauthorized or unlawful collection, use, disclosure, or disposal. A privacy program should comply with the applicable laws and regulations that govern the privacy rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). New regulations may introduce new requirements or changes that affect the organization's privacy program and expose it to potential compliance risks or penalties.Therefore, internal audit can help to establish an organization's privacy program by analyzing the risks posed by new regulations and providingassurance, advice, or recommendations on how to address them1. The other options are less appropriate or incorrect because:
B . Developing procedures to monitor the use of personal data is not an appropriate role of internal audit in helping to establish an organization's privacy program, as it is more of a management or operational role. Internal audit should not be involved in designing or implementing the organization's privacy program, as it would compromise its independence and objectivity.Internal audit should provide assurance on the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization's privacy program, but not create or execute it2.
C . Defining roles within the organization related to privacy is not an appropriate role of internal audit in helping to establish an organization's privacy program, as it is more of a governance or strategic role. Internal audit should not be involved in setting or approving the organization's privacy strategy, objectives, or policies, as it would compromise its independence and objectivity.Internal audit should provide assurance on the alignment and compliance ofthe organization's privacy program with its strategy, objectives, and policies, but not define or approve them2.
D . Designing controls to protect personal data is not an appropriate role of internal audit in helping to establish an organization's privacy program, as it is more of a management or operational role. Internal audit should not be involved in designing or implementing the organization's privacy program, as it would compromise its independence and objectivity.Internal audit should provide assurance on the adequacy and effectiveness of the organization's privacy program, but not design or implement it2.Reference:ISACA Introduces New Audit Programs for Business Continuity/Disaster ...,Best Practices for Privacy Audits - ISACA,ISACA Produces New Audit and Assurance Programs for Data Privacy and ...
