At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Isaca CCAK exam questions by Isaca. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Isaca Certificate of Cloud Auditing Knowledge exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Isaca in their Isaca CCAK exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Isaca Certificate of Cloud Auditing Knowledge exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Isaca CCAK exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
During an audit, it was identified that a critical application hosted in an off-premises cloud is not part of the organization's disaster recovery plan (DRP). Management stated that it is responsible for ensuring the cloud service provider has a plan that is tested annually. What should be the auditor's NEXT course of action?
The auditor's next course of action should be to review the contract and DR capability of the cloud service provider. The contract should specify the roles and responsibilities of both parties regarding disaster recovery, as well as the service level agreements (SLAs) and recovery time objectives (RTOs) for the critical application. The DR capability should demonstrate that the cloud service provider has a plan that is aligned with the organization's requirements and expectations, and that it is tested annually and validated by independent auditors. The auditor should also verify that the organization has a process to monitor and review the cloud service provider's performance and compliance with the contract and SLAs.
Planning an audit of the provider (B) may not be feasible or necessary, as the auditor may not have access to the provider's environment or data, and may not have the authority or expertise to conduct such an audit. The auditor should rely on the provider's audit reports and certifications to assess their compliance with relevant standards and regulations.
Reviewing the security white paper of the provider may not be sufficient or relevant, as the security white paper may not cover the specific aspects of disaster recovery for the critical application, or may not reflect the current state of the provider's security controls and practices. The security white paper may also be biased or outdated, as it is produced by the provider themselves.
Reviewing the provider's audit reports (D) may be helpful, but not enough, as the audit reports may not address the specific requirements and expectations of the organization for disaster recovery, or may not cover the latest changes or incidents that may affect the provider's DR capability. The audit reports may also have limitations or qualifications that may affect their reliability or validity.Reference:=
Audit a Disaster Recovery Plan | AlertFind
ISACA Introduces New Audit Programs for Business Continuity/Disaster ...
How to Maintain and Test a Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan
Which plan guides an organization on how to react to a security incident that might occur on the organization's systems, or that might be affecting one of its service providers?
Which of the following activities is performed outside information security monitoring?
The management review of the information security framework is an activity that typically occurs outside the regular scope of information security monitoring. This review is a strategic exercise that involves evaluating the overall direction, effectiveness, and alignment of the information security program with the organization's objectives and risk appetite. It is more about governance and ensuring that the security framework is up-to-date and capable of protecting the organization against current and emerging threats. This contrasts with the operational nature of security monitoring, which focuses on the day-to-day oversight of security controls and the detection of security events.
Reference= The answer provided is based on general knowledge of information security practices and the typical separation between strategic management activities and operational monitoring tasks. Direct references from the Cloud Auditing Knowledge (CCAK) documents and related resources by ISACA and the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) are not included here, as my current capabilities do not allow me to access or verify content from external documents or websites. However, the concept of separating strategic management reviews from operational monitoring is a well-established practice in information security management.
To ensure integration of security testing is implemented on large code sets in environments where time to completion is critical, what form of validation should an auditor expect?
The other options are not correct because:
Option C is not correct because functional verification is a type of software testing that involves verifying that the software meets the specified requirements and satisfies the user needs. Functional verification does not ensure the integration of security testing, as it does not focus on how the software is designed or configured, or how it handles malicious or unexpected inputs. Functional verification is typically performed by quality assurance teams at a later stage of the software development life cycle, and may not detect all the security vulnerabilities or risks of the software.
To ensure that cloud audit resources deliver the best value to the organization, the FIRST step is to:
