At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the IFSE Institute LLQP exam questions by IFSE Institute. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the IFSE Institute Life License Qualification Program (LLQP) exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by IFSE Institute in their IFSE Institute LLQP exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their IFSE Institute Life License Qualification Program (LLQP) exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the IFSE Institute LLQP exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Edna is a 62-year-old widow living in Quebec. She meets with Yolanda, her insurance agent. Edna worked part-time her whole life as a seamstress and has no savings. Her husband Donald had been working as a greeter at the local box store until his death 2 months ago at the age of 67. Since his passing, Edna has been struggling financially. She would like to know which of the following organizations will immediately pay her a benefit?
Since Edna was married to Donald, she is eligible to receive Canada Pension Plan (CPP) survivor benefits, which provide a monthly benefit to surviving spouses. Old Age Security (OAS) survivor allowance may not apply directly here as it is conditional and may not provide immediate benefits like the CPP does in this situation. Workers' Compensation does not apply as it pertains to workplace injuries, and since Donald was not injured on the job, it does not cover Edna's situation. Therefore, Option C is correct.
Seven years ago, Amber invested $150,000 in a non-registered equity segregated fund. Her investment grew, and today, the market value of her fund is $165,000. She places an order to redeem her fund and she wants to know how her investment will be taxed.
In a non-registered equity segregated fund, capital gains are only 50% taxable under Canadian tax rules. Amber's investment grew by $15,000, which represents a capital gain. As per LLQP guidelines, capital gains on non-registered investments are subject to preferential tax treatment, meaning only half of the gain is added to taxable income. Therefore, only $7,500 of the gain will be taxable. This treatment is consistent with capital gains taxation principles outlined in the LLQP material, where only the taxable portion of the capital gain is reported, resulting in reduced tax liability compared to regular income.
Samir applied for a life insurance policy 18 months ago. At the time of the application, he was employed as an accountant. Samir quit his accounting job 6 months ago to become a professional scuba diver.
Which of the following statements about Samir's life insurance policy is CORRECT?
In life insurance policies, once the policy is issued, the insured does not need to notify the insurer of any changes in occupation. The premiums and coverage are based on the occupation and risk profile at the time of application, and life insurance contracts do not generally require updates on occupational changes unless explicitly stated.
Therefore, regardless of Samir's current job as a scuba diver, his life insurance policy remains in force without the need for notification to the insurer. This is different from disability insurance, which may consider occupation changes to reassess risk and benefits.
Maeve is an Ontario resident. Fifteen years ago, she purchased a $250,000 whole life insurance policy and named her husband Guillaume as the primary beneficiary and her 4-year-old son Edwin as the contingent beneficiary. Last week, Tasha, Maeve's insurance agent called her to ask if she has had any life changes that would warrant a meeting to review her insurance coverage. Maeve informs her that over the last year she divorced Guillaume and that she is now living with her new boyfriend Eduardo. Tasha asks to meet Maeve to review her beneficiary designation. Who will receive Maeve's death benefit if she dies today?
In Ontario, unless a beneficiary designation is changed formally through the policyholder or as part of a court order, the originally designated beneficiary remains entitled to the death benefit. Since Maeve has not updated her beneficiary designation following her divorce, Guillaume remains the primary beneficiary. Divorce does not automatically revoke a beneficiary designation in life insurance policies. Therefore, if Maeve dies today, Guillaume would receive the death benefit. Edwin, the contingent beneficiary, would only receive the benefit if Guillaume were unable to (e.g., predeceased).
Cassie applies for a $100,000 renewable 10-year term insurance policy through Mason, her insurance of persons representative. A month later, when Mason meets with Cassie again to deliver her contract, Cassie says she had to have a biopsy the previous week for a persistent cough. Mason tells her not to worry because the policy is already accepted. He completes the policy delivery. Six months later, Mason receives a call from Cassie's boyfriend informing him that Cassie died of stage 4 throat cancer.
How will the insurance company handle the claim?
In this scenario, the policy was accepted and delivered to Cassie by Mason before her biopsy, indicating that she was considered insurable at the time of application. However, the insurance policy is subject to a two-year contestability period, during which the insurer can investigate the claim if they believe relevant information regarding the insured's health was omitted or misrepresented.
According to LLQP guidelines, insurance contracts are built on the principle of utmost good faith, requiring that both the client and the representative disclose all material facts that may affect the insurance risk. If the insured's health status changes significantly between the application and delivery of the policy, it is the representative's duty to inform the insurer to reassess the risk.
In this case, Mason, as the insurance representative, failed to disclose Cassie's new health condition, which is considered a material change to her insurability. Under LLQP ethics and practice standards, non-disclosure of this change can result in the insurer denying the claim, as it affected the underwriting decision.
Therefore, due to the lack of disclosure by Mason, the insurance company would have grounds to deny the claim based on this material change in insurability, aligning with LLQP provisions and insurance contract law.
