Refer to the exhibit.
Aruba CX 6300 switch has routes in three different VRFs as per the example above. The user needs to leak routes between VRF Secure and VRF Dev. and also between VRF default and VRF Dev
The customer Is not able to establish routing between directly connected networks 10.100.50.0/24 and 10.102.26.0/24 Which statement is true regarding the routing troubleshooting?
You have created an OSPF neighbor configuration with ArubaOS-CX 8320 VSX and a third-party switch The OSPF peering falls. In the event togs you see the following entries.
2020-10-28:03:14 20.371489|hpe-routlng|LOG_WARN|AMM|1/5jOSPFV2|OSPFV2iOSPF 268698624 Packet received with unexpected authentication type 2020-10-28:03:14.20.371503|hpe-routing|LOG_WARN|AMM|1/5|OSPFV2|OSPFV2|Expected authentication type = 0
Which statement is true about the above events?
When applying me following access-Iist to an ArubaOS-CX 6300 switch:
How does this ACL behave on the selected switch? (Select two.)
The customer is considering Implemented the following VSX configuration that will host an Aruba mobility cluster servicing 9000 dual stack employee devices.
The client's default gateways will be hosted on the VSX stack. The customer is seeking advice about how to ensure ArubaOS-CX VSX best practices have been applied.
What advice can you offer the customer? (Select two)
(Scenarios may contain multiple errors which may or may not Impact the solution > Refer to the exhibit.
An engineer has attempted to configure two pairs of switches in the referenced configuration it is required to implement VSX keep-alive at the aggregation layer.
The ports of the ArubaOS-CS 8325 switches used for Agg01 and Agg02 are populated as follows:
The configuration of switch AGG01 includes:
VSX keep-alive is not working. Which modification should you make lo resolve the error condition?
