BCS PDP9 Practice Exam Questions & Answers

Schedule 3 of the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018) provides exemptions from some of the UK GDPR provisions for certain types of personal data processing, such as health data, social work data, education data, and child abuse data. These exemptions are intended to balance the rights and freedoms of data subjects with the public interest or the legitimate interests of data controllers in specific contexts. For example, the exemptions may allow data controllers to restrict the data subjects' access to their personal data, or to process their personal data without their consent, if complying with the UK GDPR would be likely to prejudice the purposes of the processing, such as the provision of health care, social work, education, or child protection. However, Schedule 3 of the DPA 2018 does not provide any exemption for credit checking agency data, which is personal data processed by credit reference agencies for the purposes of assessing the creditworthiness of individuals or organisations, or preventing fraud or money laundering. Credit checking agency data is subject to the UK GDPR provisions as normal, unless another exemption applies. For example, credit reference agencies may rely on the crime and taxation exemption in Schedule 2, Part 1, Paragraph 2 of the DPA 2018 if disclosing personal data to a data subject would be likely to prejudice the prevention or detection of crime, or the apprehension or prosecution of offenders.Reference:

Data Protection Act 2018, Schedule 31

ICO Guide to Data Protection, Exemptions2

ICO Guide to Data Protection, Credit3

Article 33 of the UK GDPR requires controllers to notify the supervisory authority of a personal data breach without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after having become aware of it, unless the personal data breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons. This means that not all personal data breaches need to be reported to the supervisory authority, only those that pose a risk to individuals. The risk should be assessed in terms of the potential negative consequences for individuals, such as discrimination, identity theft, fraud, financial loss, damage to reputation, loss of confidentiality, or any other significant economic or social disadvantage. The UK GDPR also requires controllers to communicate the personal data breach to the affected data subjects without undue delay, where the breach is likely to result in a high risk to their rights and freedoms. The other options are incorrect because:

The UK GDPR does not require all personal data breaches to be reported to the supervisory authority, only those that pose a risk to individuals. However, controllers must document all personal data breaches, regardless of whether they are reported or not, as part of their accountability obligations.

The UK GDPR does not make a distinction between personal data and special category data when it comes to reporting personal data breaches. Special category data is a type of personal data that reveals racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union membership, or that concerns health, sex life or sexual orientation, or biometric or genetic data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person. The processing of special category data is subject to stricter conditions and safeguards under the UK GDPR, but the reporting of personal data breaches involving such data is subject to the same criteria as any other personal data breach, namely the risk to individuals.

The UK GDPR does not provide an exemption from reporting personal data breaches based on the controller's right of freedom of expression. The right of freedom of expression is a fundamental right that is recognised and protected by the UK GDPR, but it is not an absolute right that overrides the rights and freedoms of data subjects. The UK GDPR allows Member States to provide for exemptions or derogations from certain provisions of the UK GDPR for the processing of personal data carried out for journalistic purposes or the purpose of academic, artistic or literary expression, where such exemptions or derogations are necessary to reconcile the right to the protection of personal data with the right to freedom of expression and information. However, these exemptions or derogations do not apply to the obligation to report personal data breaches to the supervisory authority, unless the Member State law specifies otherwise.Reference:

UK GDPR, Article 334

UK GDPR, Article 34

UK GDPR, Article 9

UK GDPR, Article 85

A privacy notice is a document that provides individuals with information about how their personal data is processed, as required by Article 13 and 14 of the UK GDPR5. A privacy notice must include the following information, among others:

the identity and contact details of the controller and, where applicable, the controller's representative and the data protection officer;

the purposes and legal basis of the processing;

the categories of personal data concerned;

the recipients or categories of recipients of the personal data, including any third parties or international organisations;

where applicable, the fact that the controller intends to transfer personal data to a third country or international organisation and the existence or absence of an adequacy decision by the Commission, or reference to the appropriate or suitable safeguards and the means by which to obtain a copy of them or where they have been made available;

the period for which the personal data will be stored, or if that is not possible, the criteria used to determine that period;

the existence of the rights of the data subject, such as the right to access, rectify, erase, restrict, object or port the data, and the conditions or limitations on those rights;

the existence of the right to withdraw consent at any time, where the processing is based on consent;

the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority;

whether the provision of personal data is a statutory or contractual requirement, or a requirement necessary to enter into a contract, as well as whether the data subject is obliged to provide the personal data and of the possible consequences of failure to provide such data;

the existence of automated decision-making, including profiling, and meaningful information about the logic involved, as well as the significance and the envisaged consequences of such processing for the data subject.

A privacy notice does not need to contain details of the processor's staff, as this is not relevant or necessary for the data subject to understand how their personal data is processed. However, the controller may need to inform the data subject if their personal data is shared with a processor, and provide the identity and contact details of the processor, as part of the information on the recipients or categories of recipients of the personal data.Reference:

Article 13 and 14 of the UK GDPR5

A DPIA is not required to fulfil the requirement that all DPIAs are submitted to the ICO, because this is not a requirement under the GDPR. The GDPR only requires that the controller consults the ICO before carrying out processing that is likely to result in a high risk to individuals, if the controller cannot mitigate that risk. This means that not all DPIAs need to be submitted to the ICO, only those that identify a high residual risk that cannot be reduced. The other options are valid purposes of carrying out a DPIA, as they help the controller to comply with the GDPR, ensure data protection by design and by default, and identify and mitigate the main risks to individuals' rights and freedoms.Reference:

Article 35 and 36 of the GDPR3

ICO guidance on DPIAs5

The crime and taxation exemption in Schedule 2, Part 1, Paragraph 2 of the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018) provides an exemption from the UK GDPR's transparency obligations and most individual rights, including the right of access, but only if complying with them would prejudice the prevention or detection of crime, or the apprehension or prosecution of offenders. This means that the public authority does not need to disclose details of the investigation to the individual who submitted the subject access request, as doing so would be likely to hinder the investigation and enable the individual to evade justice. The public authority should assess the likelihood of prejudice on a case-by-case basis and document its reasons for relying on the exemption. The other options are incorrect because:

The legal and professional privilege exemption in Schedule 2, Part 1, Paragraph 19 of the DPA 2018 applies to personal data that is subject to an obligation of confidentiality arising from the provision of legal advice or legal representation, or from the conduct of legal proceedings. This exemption does not apply to the information held by the public authority about the investigation, as it is not related to any legal advice or representation, or any legal proceedings.

The term ''criminal offence data'' refers to personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences, or related security measures. This type of data is subject to specific rules under Article 10 of the UK GDPR and Part 3 of the DPA 2018. However, this does not mean that there is no obligation to disclose criminal offence data in response to a subject access request. The public authority still needs to consider whether any of the exemptions in the DPA 2018 apply, such as the crime and taxation exemption, before disclosing or withholding the data.

The right to be informed does apply in relation to criminal acts, as the UK GDPR requires controllers to provide data subjects with information about the processing of their personal data, including the purposes and legal basis of the processing, unless an exemption applies. The fact that the information has not yet been passed to the police does not affect the applicability of the right to be informed or the right of access.Reference:

Data Protection Act 2018, Schedule 2, Part 1, Paragraph 21

ICO Guide to Data Protection, Crime and Taxation2

Data Protection Act 2018, Schedule 2, Part 1, Paragraph 193

UK GDPR, Article 104

Data Protection Act 2018, Part 35

UK GDPR, Article 13 and 146

Article 57 of the UK GDPR states that the tasks of the Commissioner include handling complaints raised by individuals/data subjects, providing general guidance to clarify the law, and advising UK Parliament on issues related to the protection of personal data, among other tasks. However, adopting consistency findings in cross-border data protection cases is not a task of the Commissioner, but of the European Data Protection Board (EDPB), which is an independent body composed of the heads of the supervisory authorities of the EU and EEA member states and the European Data Protection Supervisor. The EDPB is responsible for ensuring the consistent application of the EU GDPR across the EU and EEA, and for issuing opinions and decisions on matters of general application or affecting more than one member state. The UK is no longer part of the EU or the EEA, and therefore the EDPB does not have jurisdiction over the UK GDPR or the Commissioner. The UK has its own mechanism for ensuring consistency and cooperation with other countries, which involves the Commissioner and the Secretary of State.Reference:

Article 57 of the UK GDPR1

Article 63 and 64 of the EU GDPR4

ICO guidance on the UK GDPR and the EU GDPR5

Article 30 of the UK GDPR3requires both controllers and processors to maintain records of their processing activities, unless they are exempted under certain conditions. The records must contain the following information, among others:

the name and contact details of the controller or the processor, and of any joint controller, representative or data protection officer;

the purposes of the processing;

the categories of data subjects and personal data;

the categories of recipients to whom the personal data have been or will be disclosed, including recipients in third countries or international organisations;

where applicable, transfers of personal data to a third country or an international organisation, including the identification of that third country or international organisation and the documentation of suitable safeguards;

where possible, the envisaged time limits for erasure of the different categories of data;

where possible, a general description of the technical and organisational security measures.

The records must be in writing, including in electronic form, and must be made available to the ICO on request. The records do not need to contain contact details of the supervisory authority, as this is not specified in Article 30. Nor do they need to be submitted to the ICO following every DPIA, as this is not required by Article 35, which only obliges the controller to consult the ICO prior to the processing if the DPIA indicates that the processing would result in a high risk in the absence of measures taken by the controller to mitigate the risk.Reference:

Article 30 of the UK GDPR3

Article 35 of the UK GDPR4